Does this woman represent the future of terrorism? We have heard about suicide bombers that were female, but a homegrown terrorist that is a woman is a rare commodity.
If you haven’t heard the story, check any website (CNN, LA Times, etc).
What do we think? To me this just proves how dangerous and prevalent the threat of homegrown terrorism really is.
Or could you just say it is a step forward for women, giving them the same opportunity to terrorize as men?
I think the lesson that needs to be learned here is that we have a problem when a random American women decides to join forces with radical Muslims.
Check out this important film that sheds light onto what happens when radicals infiltrate our own university campuses.
It often starts with groups like the Muslim Students Association (MSA) which was highlighted in the film The Third Jihad that features anti-Semitic speakers on campus. On this site, we have also highlighted Code Pink, whose activities are often questionable. Code Pink is a big supporter of Israel Apartheid Week as is the MSA and other organizations. These organizations might wear masks and appear “safe” but underneath many of them have roots that are connected to radical Islam.
Yesterday a terminal in Munich, Germany was closed due to a bomb scare. An individual’s laptop tested positive for explosives and he ran away.
Today we read in the news that perhaps it was a false alarm, perhaps he was running because he was late…
Forgive me for being confused. It is very possible that the laptop did not have explosives and that that information was false, however, how often do innocent people run? As well, aren’t people only checked when they enter the airport, so he left the airport and missed his flight?
If we do not take these incidents seriously we have learned nothing from Flight 253 which happened just a month ago! Calling this Munich incident a false alarm without having more details does not help the threat of terrorism disappear.
Click here to learn more about the threat that terrorism poses.
Code Pink is making headlines this week as the organization’s shady activities continue to unfold.
Code Pink is a women-initiated grassroots movement. They claim to advocate “life-affirming activities,” but in past they have been known to refer to our troops as terrorists. They have also called for the kidnapping of elected officials.
Their latest antics reveal that they are partnering up with the Muslim Brotherhood to “join us in cleansing our country.”
Code Pink has crossed the line and they must be investigated. All the blogs are telling you how disgusting Code Pink’s latest antics are. However, it is only on www.radicalislam.org that you can make a difference. Send an email today to FBI investigators and demand that they investigate Code Pink’s new activities with terrorist sympathizers and the Muslim Brotherhood.
I saw this claim written in different places and I didn’t believe it, so I tried it out myself. Well, it turns out they are right. When you type “Christianity is”, or Judaism or Buddhism, “Google Suggest” guesses what you are trying to say and completes the sentence (most of the results are negative). However, when you type “Islam is” there are absolutely NO suggestions!
Google told a wired.com reporter that it was simply a software glitch that they were working on. However, that was already 5 days ago and the “glitch” still exists. Aren’t there millions of geniuses working at Google?
This idea of censoring anti-Islamic rhetoric seems to be a theme these past few days. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York pulled some Muhammad works for fear of igniting a controversy.
Even the director of the film 2012 admitted to being too afraid to depict any Muslim symbols being destroyed in his newest blockbuster film, for fear of attack.
What is going on? It seems that the protesters won in the Muhammad cartoon riots in Denmark a few years back when they sparked fear in everyone one of us. Now it seems that even companies like Google would rather go out of their way to censor themselves, as to avoid what the radical Muslims have in store for us.
Tariq Ahmad, a doctor at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston wrote an OpEd in the NY Times giving what he thinks is the solution to solving the problem of radical Islam.
He states: “The reality is that many Muslims are secular. We do not pray five times a day, do not read the Koran and have not spent much time inside a mosque. We only turn to Islam when a child is born, someone gets married or someone dies. To defeat the threat of radical Islam, I suggest that the answer lies among the people who are the least Muslim.”
Dr Zhudi Jasser the narrator of the film TheThird Jihad: Radical Islam’s Vision for America, who unlike Tariq Ahmad considers himself a devout Muslim, believes that the answer lies with those members of the Muslim faith who believe that religion and state should be kept separate.
A new Palestinian Sesame Street is set to begin broadcasting in February. The project is funded by non profit organizations and boasts that the show will be unlike any other and will promote tolerance.
However, the website makes no mention of Israelis, so it will be interesting to stay tuned and see if/how Israel is portrayed on the show.
For now, we can just hope that it will in fact be a positive move for Palestinian children.
