Christians

10 Things You Need to Know about…the Islamic Republic of Iran

 

1) The head of the Iranian regime is not the president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but rather the Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 
2) The Iranian regime, according to its 1989 constitution, is dedicated to jihad to spread the Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolution, to re-establish the Caliphate, and impose Islamic law (sharia) globally. These are precisely the same objectives pursued by terrorist groups like al-Qaeda, HAMAS, and Hezbollah—which may explain why they have all been linked together with Iran in operational relationships for so many decades.
3) The primary mission of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) is to keep the regime in power. In an especially visible way since the popular uprising after the fraudulent 2009 presidential elections, the IRGC and its subordinate Bassij units have used sheer brutality and terror to suppress the democratic aspirations of the Iranian people. 
4) The Ayatollah Khomeini ordered the IRGC to acquire deliverable nuclear weapons in the mid-1980s. Every Iranian president—including those touted as ‘moderate’—has supported the acquisition of nuclear weapons, but the program has accelerated markedly under the last two presidents: Khatami and Ahmadinejad. 
5) By sheer numbers, Iran is the number two state killer of its own citizens in the world, second only to China, a country with 20 times the size of its population.  Per capita, Iran may be the biggest killer. 
6) The Iranian regime has supported the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in a vocal way ever since the uprising began there in early 2011. The Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist organization with a pervasive presence in the U.S. government, intelligence community, and society as a whole, has reached out to the Iranian regime in return and openly expressed interest in forging close ties with it. The Obama administration recently announced that it is expanding its long-standing ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.    
7) Current president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believes that the Shi’a messianic figure (the Mahdi, or Twelfth Imam), who allegedly disappeared down a well 1,000 years ago—is helping guide his government and manage world affairs.   He has publicly expressed his belief that apocalyptic violence can hasten the return of this figure.  
8) In spite of sanctions, Iran is far from isolated.  It is actively involved with many countries, diplomatically and economically, buying influence at a growing pace.  This includes the viscerally anti-American regime of Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and a growing list of other countries in America’s backyard of South and Central America.   Iran also has been developing relations with countries like Eritrea, Sudan,  Algeria,  Afghanistan, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Qatar, and recently Israel’s neighbor Jordan.
9) “Iran has methodically cultivated a network of sponsored terrorist surrogates capable of conducting effective plausibly deniable attacks against Israel and the United States.”   This includes a network of terror proxies, such as Hezbollah, which has an extensive presence across Latin America, especially in Venezuela, and also in Mexico.  Hezbollah operates at least a dozen cells within the U.S. as well. 
10) The Havlish case (Havlish et al vs Osama bin Laden, Iran, et al.), filed in New York in May 2011, presented compelling evidence that the Iranian regime provided direct and material assistance to al-Qaeda for the 9/11 attacks. 

1) The head of the Iranian regime is not the president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but rather the Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

2) The Iranian regime, according to its 1989 constitution, is dedicated to jihad to spread the Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolution, to re-establish the Caliphate, and impose Islamic law (sharia) globally. These are precisely the same objectives pursued by terrorist groups like al-Qaeda, HAMAS, and Hezbollah—which may explain why they have all been linked together with Iran in operational relationships for so many decades.

3) The primary mission of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) is to keep the regime in power. In an especially visible way since the popular uprising after the fraudulent 2009 presidential elections, the IRGC and its subordinate Bassij units have used sheer brutality and terror to suppress the democratic aspirations of the Iranian people. 

4) The Ayatollah Khomeini ordered the IRGC to acquire deliverable nuclear weapons in the mid-1980s. Every Iranian president—including those touted as ‘moderate’—has supported the acquisition of nuclear weapons, but the program has accelerated markedly under the last two presidents: Khatami and Ahmadinejad. 

5) By sheer numbers, Iran is the number two state killer of its own citizens in the world, second only to China, a country with 20 times the size of its population.  Per capita, Iran may be the biggest killer. 

6) The Iranian regime has supported the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in a vocal way ever since the uprising began there in early 2011. The Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist organization with a pervasive presence in the U.S. government, intelligence community, and society as a whole, has reached out to the Iranian regime in return and openly expressed interest in forging close ties with it. The Obama administration recently announced that it is expanding its long-standing ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. 

7) Current president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believes that the Shi’a messianic figure (the Mahdi, or Twelfth Imam), who allegedly disappeared down a well 1,000 years ago—is helping guide his government and manage world affairs.   He has publicly expressed his belief that apocalyptic violence can hasten the return of this figure.  

8) In spite of sanctions, Iran is far from isolated.  It is actively involved with many countries, diplomatically and economically, buying influence at a growing pace.  This includes the viscerally anti-American regime of Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and a growing list of other countries in America’s backyard of South and Central America. Iran also has been developing relations with countries like Eritrea, Sudan,  Algeria,  Afghanistan, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Qatar, and recently Israel’s neighbor Jordan.

9) “Iran has methodically cultivated a network of sponsored terrorist surrogates capable of conducting effective plausibly deniable attacks against Israel and the United States.”   This includes a network of terror proxies, such as Hezbollah, which has an extensive presence across Latin America, especially in Venezuela, and also in Mexico.  Hezbollah operates at least a dozen cells within the U.S. as well. 

10) The Havlish case (Havlish et al vs Osama bin Laden, Iran, et al.), filed in New York in May 2011, presented compelling evidence that the Iranian regime provided direct and material assistance to al-Qaeda for the 9/11 attacks. 

 

Egypt: Desire for Money - Jizya - Prompts Attacks on Christians

FrontPage Magazine
Raymond Ibrahim
July 6, 2011

If growing numbers of Muslims in Egypt have an intrinsic hatred for all things Christian—most recently demonstrated by the torching of eight Christian homes on the rumor that a church was being built—let us not forget that this hate has instrumental, that is, economic benefits: the extortion of money from the non-believer—tribute from the conquered infidels to their Islamic overlords—otherwise known as jizya.
Consider: on June 24, hundreds of Muslims surrounded a Coptic church in Egypt, vowing to kill its priest—who was locked inside serving morning mass to several parishioners. The Muslims cried “We will kill the priest, we will kill him and no one will prevent us,” adding that they would “cut him to pieces.”
As usual, police and security forces gave the terrorists ample time to terrorize—appearing a full five hours after the incident began; and when they escorted the priest out, it “looked as if he was the criminal, leaving his church in a police car.”

If growing numbers of Muslims in Egypt have an intrinsic hatred for all things Christian—most recently demonstrated by the torching of eight Christian homes on the rumor that a church was being built—let us not forget that this hate has instrumental, that is, economic benefits: the extortion of money from the non-believer—tribute from the conquered infidels to their Islamic overlords—otherwise known as jizya.

Consider: on June 24, hundreds of Muslims surrounded a Coptic church in Egypt, vowing to kill its priest—who was locked inside serving morning mass to several parishioners. The Muslims cried “We will kill the priest, we will kill him and no one will prevent us,” adding that they would “cut him to pieces.”

As usual, police and security forces gave the terrorists ample time to terrorize—appearing a full five hours after the incident began; and when they escorted the priest out, it “looked as if he was the criminal, leaving his church in a police car.”

What, exactly, did the rioting Muslims want this time? Why were they threatening to kill the priest?

The official story is that they were livid that the priest had earlier tried to make renovations to the 100-year old church—Islam forbids building new or repairing old churches. After forcing renovations to cease on threats that they would demolish the church, they also tried to banish the priest, giving him 50 days to quit the region. The priest’s time was up, yet he refused to abandon his flock. Hence, the wild attack.

However, Arabic news sources like El-Bashayer reveal a different, more practical, motivation: the desire to extort money from the Christians—echoed in an earlier report as a desire for a “donation” from the church:

Security forces succeeded in rescuing the life of the priest of St. George Church in Beni Ahmad, west of al-Minya, from being killed at the hands of the Salafists because of his refusal to pay them jizya money, according to sources…. [T]he church’s priest had declared that the Copts would not pay jizya, in any way, shape, or form. This is what caused the Salafists to want to banish him from the region, so they could collect jizya from the Copts.

This is not surprising; anyone following the growing Islamization of Egypt knows that increasing numbers of Muslims—called “Salafists,” that is, those who seek only to emulate Muhammad and the early generations of Islam—have been eying their Christian neighbors as easy sources for quick cash.

For instance, who could forget Egyptian preacher Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini’s recent lament that Muslims would alleviate their economic woes if only they would return to the good old days of Islam, when abducting and selling or ransoming infidels was a great way of making a living. (Accordingly, weeks later, two teenage Christian girls in Egypt were reported as kidnapped, held ransom, and then “sold” to another group.)

Nor is this outlook limited to self-professed “Salafists”: Earlier, Dr. Amani Tawfiq, a female professor at Egypt’s Mansoura University, said, “If Egypt wants to slowly but surely get out of its economic situation and address poverty in the country, the jizya has to be imposed on the Copts.” And days ago, Hazim Abu Isma’il, who is running for Egypt’s presidency, vowed he would impose the jizya on Egypt’s Christians.

Indeed, Al Azhar—Egypt’s, if not the Islamic world’s, top authority, often accused of being too “moderate” by Salafists—recently made Islam’s official position clear when its grand leader, Imam Ahmad Tayeb, defying history and reality, proclaimed that “the Copts have been living in Egypt for over 14 centuries in safety, and there is no need for all this artificial concern over them,” adding that “true terrorism was created by the West.”

Islamists Target Egypt's Christians

IPT News
May 25, 2011
Egypt's Arab Spring has become a nightmare for the nation's 2,000-year-old Coptic Christian community, now the terror target of choice for Islamist radicals. Christians' "personal security has gotten much worse" since the February ouster of President Hosni Mubarak, says Nina Shea of the Hudson Institute, who monitors the situation of religious minorities in the Muslim world.
Christian homes, businesses and churches have come under increasing attack from militant Islamists, with many of the assaults coming shortly after angry sermons given at Friday prayers. The sermons inciting the violence often come from Salafist imams subsidized by the Egyptian government.

IPT News
May 25, 2011

Egypt's Arab Spring has become a nightmare for the nation's 2,000-year-old Coptic Christian community, now the terror target of choice for Islamist radicals. Christians' "personal security has gotten much worse" since the February ouster of President Hosni Mubarak, says Nina Shea of the Hudson Institute, who monitors the situation of religious minorities in the Muslim world.

Christian homes, businesses and churches have come under increasing attack from militant Islamists, with many of the assaults coming shortly after angry sermons given at Friday prayers. The sermons inciting the violence often come from Salafist imams subsidized by the Egyptian government.

Continue reading here

An Ill Season: The Arab Spring Unleashes Islamists on Egyptian Christians

Family Security Matters
Andrew McCarthy
May 16, 2011

Screaming “With our blood and soul, we will defend you, Islam,” jihadists stormed the Virgin Mary Church in northwest Cairo last weekend. They torched the Coptic Christian house of worship, burned the nearby homes of two Copt families to the ground, attacked a residential complex, killed a dozen people, and wounded more than 200: just another day in this spontaneous democratic uprising by Muslim hearts yearning for freedom.
 
In the delusional vocabulary of the “Arab Spring,” this particular episode is known as a sectarian “clash.” That was the Washington Post’s take. Its headline reads “12 dead in Egypt as Christians and Muslims clash” — in the same way, one supposes, that a mugger’s fist can be said to “clash” with his victim’s face. The story goes on, in nauseating “cycle of violence” style, to describe “clashes between Muslims and Coptic Christians” that “left” 12 dead, dozens more wounded, “and a church charred” — as if it were not crystal clear who were the clashers and who were the clashees, as if the church were somehow combusted into a flaming heap without some readily identifiable actors having done the charring.

Screaming “With our blood and soul, we will defend you, Islam,” jihadists stormed the Virgin Mary Church in northwest Cairo last weekend. They torched the Coptic Christian house of worship, burned the nearby homes of two Copt families to the ground, attacked a residential complex, killed a dozen people, and wounded more than 200: just another day in this spontaneous democratic uprising by Muslim hearts yearning for freedom.

In the delusional vocabulary of the “Arab Spring,” this particular episode is known as a sectarian “clash.” That was the Washington Post’s take. Its headline reads “12 dead in Egypt as Christians and Muslims clash” — in the same way, one supposes, that a mugger’s fist can be said to “clash” with his victim’s face. The story goes on, in nauseating “cycle of violence” style, to describe “clashes between Muslims and Coptic Christians” that “left” 12 dead, dozens more wounded, “and a church charred” — as if it were not crystal clear who were the clashers and who were the clashees, as if the church were somehow combusted into a flaming heap without some readily identifiable actors having done the charring.

Continue reading here

The Muslims' "Christian Problem"

 

By Clifford May
In one of his many magnificent books, Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis notes that in 641 C.E., the Caliph Umar "decreed that Jews and Christians should be removed from all but the southern and eastern fringes of Arabia, in fulfillment of an injunction of the Prophet uttered on his deathbed: 'Let there not be two religions in Arabia.'" I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that this had nothing to do with Jewish settlements in the West Bank or American support for Israel.
Fast-forward a few centuries: Today, many Muslims believe in peaceful and even cordial coexistence among Muslims, Christians and Jews. But such tolerant views are far from universal. In January, Dr. Imad Mustafa, a professor at Cairo's prestigious al-Azhar University, set out the justifications for jihad, or holy war. Among them: "To remove every religion but Islam from the Arabian peninsula." And, he said, jihad is also legitimate "to extend God's religion to people in cases where the government does not allow it"—in other words, to spread Islam and sharia, Islamic law.
Such rulings are not of merely theological interest. They lend legitimacy to violence directed at religious minorities. And indeed, in recent months, there has been a wave of attacks against Christians across what we have come to call the Muslim world. Churches have been bombed in Egypt, Iraq, Nigeria and the Philippines. In Indonesia, a mob of 1,000 Muslims burned two churches to the ground.
In Iran, scores of Christians have been arrested on various pretexts. In Afghanistan, a man has been jailed and is expected to be tried for converting to Christianity. Capital punishment is a real possibility. In Pakistan, a Christian woman was sentenced to death for the crime of making remarks that were regarded as insulting to Islam. The moderate governor of Punjab promised to pardon her and sharply criticized the blasphemy laws. But he was assassinated by a member of his own security detail, who afterward called his action "the punishment for a blasphemer." Hundreds of Pakistani Islamic clerics praised the killer's "courage" and religious zeal.
French president Nicolas Sarkozy has connected these dots and called the picture that emerges "religious cleansing." Pope Benedict XVI urged Christian communities in Muslim-majority lands to respond nonviolently to what he termed "a strategy of violence that has Christians as a target." The pontiff implored the governments of the Middle East to adopt "effective measures for the protection of religious minorities." The clerics at al-Azhar University called the pope's remarks "insulting" and suspended dialogue with the Vatican.
Most of the media have been ignoring this story or, in some cases, insisting that there is no story. If Christians are suffering in places where they are the minority, the root cause must be economics or politics or culture or misunderstanding—anything but intolerance and oppression based on Islamic religious doctrine. To believe this requires ignoring much evidence, not least the instances where, when a church is burned or a Christian murdered, the perpetrators yell, "Allahu Akbar!"
Investor's Business Daily recently quoted James Zogby, head of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, offering a creative analysis. "The guy who gets up on the plane and says 'Allah!' or whatever and then blows the plane up is not making a statement about his faith," Zogby told congressional staffers. Zogby explained that it's like a Christian hitting his thumb with a hammer and exclaiming "Jesus Christ!"
"The comparison is absurd," IBD comments. "Muslims say 'Allah is greatest' to exalt their God. When Christians mutter 'Jesus Christ,' they are in contrast taking their Lord's name in vain."
Why should Jews care about Muslim persecution of Christians? Youssef M. Ibrahim, an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian and a fellow reporter back when we were both at The New York Times, puts it succinctly: "In the 1950s and '60s, they kicked the Jews out of the Middle East—everywhere but Israel, and, of course, they haven't given up there. Now, they are kicking out the Christians, too. It was inevitable."
What is not inevitable is the final outcome. Thirty years from now will the Muslim world—from Morocco to Indonesia—be "religiously cleansed"? Will other groups, for example the Kurds and Darfuris—Muslims but ethnic minorities—also be decimated or even exterminated? What about homosexuals—now facing severe persecution in Iran, Gaza and other places? What about women's rights?
Religious cleansing and the persecution of minorities in the Muslim world is not an easy problem to tackle. But surely the first step is to acknowledge that it is a problem—a major problem—and to begin talking about it candidly, understanding that some will complain they have been insulted or will level accusations of bigotry and "Islamophobia."
Long ago, there were Jewish communities in the heart of Arabia. They were exterminated by their neighbors, adherents to a dynamic, expansive and ambitious new religion. Not so long ago, there were Jewish communities throughout the broader Middle East. But in the second half of the last century, most Jews fled Muslim lands.
Today, there is Israel, a refuge for the Jewish people and an oasis of diversity and tolerance. If you think it's lonely and difficult for Israel now, consider what it will be like if all the nations surrounding Israel rid themselves of Christians and other minorities while the rest of the world—out of misplaced sensitivity or cowardice or some combination—averts its gaze.

By Clifford May

In one of his many magnificent books, Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis notes that in 641 C.E., the Caliph Umar "decreed that Jews and Christians should be removed from all but the southern and eastern fringes of Arabia, in fulfillment of an injunction of the Prophet uttered on his deathbed: 'Let there not be two religions in Arabia.'" I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that this had nothing to do with Jewish settlements in the West Bank or American support for Israel.

Fast-forward a few centuries: Today, many Muslims believe in peaceful and even cordial coexistence among Muslims, Christians and Jews. But such tolerant views are far from universal. In January, Dr. Imad Mustafa, a professor at Cairo's prestigious al-Azhar University, set out the justifications for jihad, or holy war. Among them: "To remove every religion but Islam from the Arabian peninsula." And, he said, jihad is also legitimate "to extend God's religion to people in cases where the government does not allow it"—in other words, to spread Islam and sharia, Islamic law.

Such rulings are not of merely theological interest. They lend legitimacy to violence directed at religious minorities. And indeed, in recent months, there has been a wave of attacks against Christians across what we have come to call the Muslim world. Churches have been bombed in Egypt, Iraq, Nigeria and the Philippines. In Indonesia, a mob of 1,000 Muslims burned two churches to the ground.

In Iran, scores of Christians have been arrested on various pretexts. In Afghanistan, a man has been jailed and is expected to be tried for converting to Christianity. Capital punishment is a real possibility. In Pakistan, a Christian woman was sentenced to death for the crime of making remarks that were regarded as insulting to Islam. The moderate governor of Punjab promised to pardon her and sharply criticized the blasphemy laws. But he was assassinated by a member of his own security detail, who afterward called his action "the punishment for a blasphemer." Hundreds of Pakistani Islamic clerics praised the killer's "courage" and religious zeal.

French president Nicolas Sarkozy has connected these dots and called the picture that emerges "religious cleansing." Pope Benedict XVI urged Christian communities in Muslim-majority lands to respond nonviolently to what he termed "a strategy of violence that has Christians as a target." The pontiff implored the governments of the Middle East to adopt "effective measures for the protection of religious minorities." The clerics at al-Azhar University called the pope's remarks "insulting" and suspended dialogue with the Vatican.

Most of the media have been ignoring this story or, in some cases, insisting that there is no story. If Christians are suffering in places where they are the minority, the root cause must be economics or politics or culture or misunderstanding—anything but intolerance and oppression based on Islamic religious doctrine. To believe this requires ignoring much evidence, not least the instances where, when a church is burned or a Christian murdered, the perpetrators yell, "Allahu Akbar!"

Investor's Business Daily recently quoted James Zogby, head of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, offering a creative analysis. "The guy who gets up on the plane and says 'Allah!' or whatever and then blows the plane up is not making a statement about his faith," Zogby told congressional staffers. Zogby explained that it's like a Christian hitting his thumb with a hammer and exclaiming "Jesus Christ!"

"The comparison is absurd," IBD comments. "Muslims say 'Allah is greatest' to exalt their God. When Christians mutter 'Jesus Christ,' they are in contrast taking their Lord's name in vain."

Why should Jews care about Muslim persecution of Christians? Youssef M. Ibrahim, an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian and a fellow reporter back when we were both at The New York Times, puts it succinctly: "In the 1950s and '60s, they kicked the Jews out of the Middle East—everywhere but Israel, and, of course, they haven't given up there. Now, they are kicking out the Christians, too. It was inevitable."

What is not inevitable is the final outcome. Thirty years from now will the Muslim world—from Morocco to Indonesia—be "religiously cleansed"? Will other groups, for example the Kurds and Darfuris—Muslims but ethnic minorities—also be decimated or even exterminated? What about homosexuals—now facing severe persecution in Iran, Gaza and other places? What about women's rights?

Religious cleansing and the persecution of minorities in the Muslim world is not an easy problem to tackle. But surely the first step is to acknowledge that it is a problem—a major problem—and to begin talking about it candidly, understanding that some will complain they have been insulted or will level accusations of bigotry and "Islamophobia."

Long ago, there were Jewish communities in the heart of Arabia. They were exterminated by their neighbors, adherents to a dynamic, expansive and ambitious new religion. Not so long ago, there were Jewish communities throughout the broader Middle East. But in the second half of the last century, most Jews fled Muslim lands.

Today, there is Israel, a refuge for the Jewish people and an oasis of diversity and tolerance. If you think it's lonely and difficult for Israel now, consider what it will be like if all the nations surrounding Israel rid themselves of Christians and other minorities while the rest of the world—out of misplaced sensitivity or cowardice or some combination—averts its gaze.

Clifford D. May is a former New York Times foreign correspondent and the president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on terrorism and Islamism.

This article was originally published in Moment Magazine.

 

The Third Jihad - Christian Persecution

Christian Persecution

Christians are persecuted around the world, particularly in Muslim countries where Sharia Law is practiced.

Why Do Christians Remain Silent About the Persecution of Christians in Muslim-Majority Societies?

By Barry Rubin *
November 5, 2010


Christians in Iraq have been, and not for the first time, deliberately targeted in a major terrorist attack. Indeed, from Indonesia to Pakistan to Iraq, from the Gaza Strip to Egypt to Sudan to Nigeria, Christians are being assaulted, intimidated, and murdered by militant Muslims.

Yet virtually never do Christians in any of these countries-perhaps with some occasional exceptions in India--attack Muslims. In the West, there have been no armed terrorist attacks on Muslims or the deliberate killing of Muslims. There does not exist a single group advocating such behavior.

Have you seen any of this in the Western mass media? Have any Christian church groups-some of which find ample time to criticize Israel-even mentioned this systematic assault? Indeed, on the rare occasions that the emigration of Christians is mentioned, somehow it is blamed on Israel, as one American network news show did recently.

I'm not writing this to complain about double standards, since one takes this problem for granted, but out of sheer puzzlement. Presumably, much of the Western media and intelligentsia-along with a lot of the church leadership, assumes that it is impossible for a non-Western, "non-white" group to ever be prejudiced. There is also a belief that if one dares report the news about pogroms carried about by Muslims against Christians it will trigger pogroms by Christians against Muslims.

The Catholic Church is quiet because it fears that complaints will increase persecution. Indeed, at a recent high-level Synod for the Middle East, leading Catholic clerics from the region blasted Israel and talked about how wonderfully Christians are treated in Muslim-majority countries. Iraq was singled out as a country where there were no problems in Muslim-Christian relations. Apparently, though, appeasement isn't working.

The al-Qaida terrorists said that all Iraqi Christians would be "exterminated" if two "Muslim women" in Egypt were not freed. Apparently, these were two young women, both married to Coptic Christian priests, unlikely candidates for conversion to Islam. They were in fact kidnapped and forcibly converted.

Thus, aggression against Christians is turned into a rationale to persecute Christians, a pattern we have often seen used elsewhere by Islamists. Yet many of the attacks in these countries are not carried out by revolutionary Islamist groups but simply by regular people, sometimes in large groups.

Here's a very partial chronology of such attacks and for the situation in Egypt go here.

According to the Iraqi terrorists' statement, the church was a, "Dirty place of the infidel that Iraqi Christians have long used as a base to fight Islam." Increasingly, Islamists are making it clear that any presence of Christians in Muslim-majority countries is unacceptable, just as the existence of a Jewish state in the Middle East is unacceptable.

I just cannot understand how this factor and these attacks so often go unnoticed, and certainly unprotested. Isn't it time for Christians to try to help their persecuted brethren before they are wiped out--or at least forced to flee--altogether?

PS: I'm tempted to write an article entitled, "Why Do Feminists Remain Silent About the Persecution of Women in Muslim-Majority Societies." But Phyllis Chesler has already covered that subject extensively.

For the original version of this article please see: http://www.gloria-center.org/gloria/2010/11/why-do-christians-remain-silent-about-the-persecution-of-christians-in-the-middle-east

*Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest books are Lebanon: Liberation, Conflict, and Crisis (Palgrave Macmillan), Conflict and Insurgency in the Contemporary Middle East (Routledge), The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition) (Viking-Penguin), the paperback edition of The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan), A Chronological History of Terrorism (Sharpe), and The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley).

Featured in The Third Jihad - the Persecution of Christians by Radical Muslims

Christian Persecution

From a special segment of The Third Jihad, witness the threat of Christian persecution at the hands of radical Muslims

Christian Man Raped, Murdered for Refusing to Convert to Islam

Christian Man Raped, Murdered for Refusing to Convert to Islam, Family Says

Saturday, June 13, 2009
By Nora Zimmett

A young Christian man was raped and brutally murdered in Pakistan for refusing to convert to Islam, and police are doing nothing about it, the victim's brother and minister told FOXNews.com.

Pakistani police reportedly found the body of Tariq "Litto" Mashi Ghauri — a 28-year-old university student in Sargodha, Pakistan — lying dead in a canal outside a rural village in Punjab Province on May 15. He had been raped and stabbed at least five times.

Persecution of Egyptian Christians

Egyptian Christians Persecuted

Documentary account on the lives of Coptic Christians, the Zevulin, living in Egypt and facing daily persecution.